The other day, I got a call from a number I didn’t know. Usually, I don’t pick up calls from unknown numbers, but for some reason, I did this time. Here’s our conversation.
Me: Hello, this is Margot Kinberg.
Caller: Are you the crime writer Margot Kinberg who keeps a blog?
Me: Yes, I am. How can I help you? (I was hoping it might be a publisher).
Caller: My name is Riley Upper, and I represent Citizens for Online Supervision. I’m calling about your blog and your books. They are indecent and highly inappropriate. We want you to delete your blog and stop selling your books.
Me (Struggling to think about my recent posts): I don’t think I’ve written anything explicit on my blog.
Riley: Do you or do you not write about crime?
Me: I write about crime fiction, yes.
Riley: You see? Your blog posts are inciting people to commit crime!!
Me: I haven’t encouraged anyone to commit a crime.
Riley: You write about it, and that drives people to be criminals!
Me: I don’t think it does.
I was hoping that would be the end of it, and I was about to finish the call, but Riley had more to say.
Riley: It’s not just your blog, you know.
Me: What do you mean?
Riley: You can’t fool me! I read a book of yours. There’s crime in those books. And swear words.
Me: I don’t think anyone learns to swear by reading my books. And I don’t think anyone learns to commit a crime by reading them, either.
Riley: How do you know? In fact, I’ve contacted my local library and bookstore and told them your books must be removed immediately. And you need to take down that horrible blog of yours, too!
Then a thought occurred to me.
Me: You know, if you find my blog posts and books offensive, you certainly don’t have to read them. You’re free to not visit my site if you don’t want to, and you don’t need to read the books.
Riley: But what about other people? They should not be reading things like that.
Me: But who gets to choose what people should read?
Riley: (In a condescending tone): We at Citizens For Online Supervision want to make the web a happy place for everyone. We know the things that make people happy. You know, dogs, bunnies, flowers, happy fairy tales, that sort of thing. Certainly nothing like crime, poverty, divorce, or anything like that.
Me: But shouldn’t people decide for themselves what they want to read?
Riley: We can’t do that! People might read something that makes them unhappy or makes them uncomfortable.
Me: Maybe they’d start to think more clearly, or more deeply, or –’
Riley: But that’s just what we don’t want!
Me: You know, that’s what I thought. Thanks for your call, but I think I’ll let people decide for themselves whether they want to read my blog, or my books, or anything else.
End Call
This didn’t really happen, as you’ve probably guessed. But there really are several groups that want to ban books and remove them from libraries, schools, bookshops, and online. This week is Banned Books Week in the US. It’s a time to especially value the right to read what we choose and make a commitment to ensure that everyone can read what they choose, and authors can write what they choose. It’s a time to speak up for, vote for, and support freedom of reading. If you don’t think we need to be aware of this issue, think again.
You make such a good point here, Margot. I’m a strong believer in the freedom to read what you want and to allow your own intelligence to decide whether what it says is good, or bad, or for you. No-one else should make that decision for you – once we start censoring books it’s the start of a slippery slope…
LikeLike
Thank you, KBR. You’re absolutely right that the minute we restrict what people can read, this starts us down a very, very dangerous path. People need to, and have the right to, choose for themselves what to read. And yes, we also have the intelligence to work out whether what we read is good or bad, meaningful or not, fun or not. I don’t believe that’s anyone else’s right.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A good point very nicely made, Margot. Not too much of a stretch to see that actually happening either.
LikeLike
Thank you, Cath. And you’re right; I’m sure things like this could easily happen. It’s a real cause for concern, in my opinion.
LikeLike
Well said, Margot. I find the banning of books to be quite abhorrent, a step on a very slippery slope.
LikeLike
Thank you, Janet. I couldn’t agree with you more, and you put that well. It really is a perilous step on a dangerously slippery slope. That’s why I think we need to call it out and stop it whenever it rears its head.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for this Margot – a clever way of making your point. I know this is a cause close to your heart, and I totally agree and am cheering you on!
LikeLike
Thanks, Moira! I’m very glad you enjoyed the post, and yes, it’s very close to my heart.
LikeLike
I absolutely detest the idea of banning books. I’ve been following this book ban thing (I think it’s popular in Florida) for a little while now, and though I don’t know enough to be an intelligent commenter, I think the very notion’s sick. They burned books in Nazi Germany and we know what happened. We should get to make our choices.
LikeLike
I agree with you, OP. Banning books is so awful on every level, and it can creep up on a society. That’s why, in my opinion, we need to be especially careful. As you say, the Nazis burned books and they’re not the only ones. People have the right to choose to read or not read something. It’s not someone else’s decision to make.
LikeLiked by 1 person