I Am Just Your Average Guy*

There’s a popular conception of fictional police officers as ‘regular guys’ – certainly not stupid (in fact, some are very intelligent indeed), but also not overly intellectual. That sort of character can be appealing to readers, who often appreciate a ‘no fuss,’ down-to-earth character. It’s interesting, too, when ‘regular guy’ characters are contrasted with more intellectual characters. That sort of pairing can highlight the different strengths of the characters, and that can add to a story.

Agatha Christie’s Chief Inspector James ‘Jimmy’ Japp is a smart, experienced police detective. Christie makes it clear that Japp is no bumbling fool. But he’s not overly intellectual. He’s practical and pragmatic, likes his steak and a pint, and tends to be direct and to the point when he speaks. He’s a ‘regular guy’ who also happens to be good at what he does, and that down-to-earth world view is very helpful as he investigates. He’s not impressed with titles and pedigrees, as he knows that anyone can be a killer. In several of Christie’s stories, Japp works with Hercule Poirot. For his part, Poirot respects Japp, and knows that he’s a skilled detective; to Poirot, that matters a great deal more than whether Japp attended university and what he might have studied.

Colin Dexter’s Sergeant Lewis is also a ‘regular guy’ sort of a copper. He likes his simple dinner of eggs and chips, he’s not one to use a lot of flowery language, and he hasn’t read all the classics. Instead, he’s a smart, pragmatic detective who sees the real-world implications of things. His boss, Inspector Morse, values Lewis as a trustworthy, capable police officer who understands police procedure and who can often offer a valuable perspective on a case. Morse is hardly demonstrative, but it’s not hard to see that for him, Lewis doesn’t have to quote the Greek and Roman philosophers in order to do the job well.

Reginald Hill’s Superintendent Andy Dalziel is about as ‘regular guy’ as you can get. He doesn’t observe all of the social niceties, and he prefers pub grub to haute cuisine. He’s not much of a respecter of university credentials, either. What he is, though, is a brilliant detective with an instinct for putting the pieces of a puzzle together. He’s blunt-spoken, but that doesn’t mean he can’t follow the subtleties of a conversation (or a murder case). He’s quite a contrast to his second-in-command, Peter Pascoe, who’s university educated and much more sensitive to social nuances than his boss is. They get on each other’s nerves at times, but Pascoe knows that Dalziel is smart and has integrity. He has a very practical way of getting to the truth about cases, and he’s got the courage to go wherever the truth takes him.

Geraldine Evans’ Detective Inspector (DI) Joe Rafferty is also what you’d call a ‘regular guy.’ He’s not university educated, he’s not overly intellectual, and he doesn’t have gourmet tastes. He can be superstitious, and he’s no bibliophile. But he’s got a way of putting the pieces of a case together, and he has a pragmatic outlook that helps him to get things done. He works mostly with Detective Sergeant Dafyd Llewellyn, who is quite different in outlook and temperament. Llewellyn is educated, meticulous, and a traditionalist. He has little patience for Rafferty’s occasional spontaneous ideas, and makes his disapproval clear. For his part, Rafferty sometimes gets tired of Llewellyn’s ‘fussbudget’ ways and his literary references. That said, though, the two are a good team. They respect each other, and even tap each other’s skills. Llewellyn, for instance, relies on his boss’ superior social skills. Rafferty counts on Llewellyn’s ability to get information and put it all together.

Of course, there are plenty of ‘regular guy’ cops who don’t work with partners. I’m sure you could name more than I could. For instance, Joseph Wambaugh’s The Golden Orange introduces Winston ‘Winnie’ Farlowe, a ex-police officer in California’s Orange County. He’s an average-looking man who has no illusions about his superior intellectual skills. In fact, he sees himself for exactly what he is: a normal guy – a cop – who likes his drink far too much, and who likes to hang out with ‘regular people.’ Then, after his police career is ended by an injury, he meets Tess Binder. She’s a divorcee who moves among Orange County’s wealthy elite at Newport Harbor. She takes an interest in Farlowe, and, against all odds, they start a relationship. He’s not at all stupid; he himself wonders why someone like Tess would be interested in someone like him. But he happily goes along for the ride. What he doesn’t know is that Tess has ulterior motives, and may very well be planning to draw him into a scam.

‘Regular guy’ fictional cops can be appealing to readers who like characters who are like ‘the rest of us.’ They often have a practical way of looking at life, and a plain-spoken way of expressing themselves, and that can also be appealing. It’s especially interesting to see how coppers like that work with others who are very different. But even when they don’t, they can make for solid characters. Which ones have stayed with you?


*NOTE: The title of this post is a line from Lou Reed’s Average Guy.

12 thoughts on “I Am Just Your Average Guy*

  1. Nice post, Margot! A think a lot of the detectives in the reprinted British Library Crime Classics are pretty regular guys – John Bude’s Inspector Meredith springs to mind – and they can be just as enjoyable to read about as the more eccentric or individual sleuths!


    1. Thanks, KBR! I think those regular guys like Meredith are interesting and enjoyable, too. Somehow, I think they’re more relatable if that makes sense. And it is nice that the BL is bringing back some of the less well known regular guys.

      Liked by 1 person

    1. Pushed return too soon. Tatum Gray is also a brilliant FBI agent, but because he’s an average guy, he takes a backseat to his partner, Zoe Bentley. Still my favorite character in the series.


      1. Oh, that’s really interesting, Sue! It’s making me think about other fictional partnerships where the person who takes the backseat is the one you wouldn’t have expected. Thanks for the ‘food for thought!’

        Liked by 1 person

  2. I probably don’t read enough police procedural fiction to form more than a passing acquaintance with many detectives. It’s interesting to note that a lot of them come as a pairing …. Harpur and Iles, Rizzoli and Isles and the ones you’ve mentioned. Different characters, differenet traits, strengths and weaknesses and a different sort of dynamic to a single alpha or a bigger team.


    1. You know, Col, you make a point about the pairings. I think allows the author some flexibility with respect to plot. It also, as you say, allows the characters to play off one another, and that can add to a story, too. I’m glad you mentioned both of those pairs, too – they’re good examples of what I had in mind.


  3. Margot, as I read your fine post I thought of Hamish MacBeth in the mysteries of M.C. Beaton. He is a bright man who is comfortable in rural Scotland. I enjoyed him in the books and in the T.V. series.


    1. Thanks for mentioning Hamish Macbeth, Bill. He really is a good example of a down-to-earth ‘regular guy.’ He’s smart and capable, but as you say, comfortable with his average sort of life.


Leave a Reply to Sue Coletta Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s