Though I Never Knew You At All*

In many crime novels, we meet the victim before that person is killed. That lets the reader form an opinion about that person and gives insight into what that person is like. In some cases, though, the victim is already dead when the story begins. Using that strategy means that the reader learns about that person through the eyes of other people (family members, friends, and other witnesses). A portrait of the victim emerges from those recollections. It’s an interesting approach to character development and can work well if it’s done effectively.

Agatha Christie used that strategy in a few of her novels. For example, in 4:50 From Paddington, Elspeth McGillicuddy is on her way to visit her friend Miss Marple. During her train ride, she happens to look out of her window while another train passes, going in the same direction. She glances into a window in the other train and, to her shock, sees a man strangling a woman. She alerts the conductor, but a body wasn’t discovered on the other train. What’s more, no-one has been reported missing. As you can imagine, the authorities don’t set much store by what Mrs. McGillicuddy says, but Miss Marple does. She works out how it could be possible to kill someone on a train without a body being found and, with the help of her friend Lucy Eyelesbarrow, finds out where the body is. But we never meet the dead woman herself. As the novel goes on, we learn who she was, what she was doing on the train, and who killed her, but she never gets to speak for herself.

Neither does Roseanna McGraw, the victim in Maj Sjöwall and Per Wahlöö’s Roseanna. Stockholm homicide detective Martin Beck and his team are called to the scene when the body of a young woman is pulled from Lake Vättern. At first, nothing is known about her, and it takes some time to even identify her, since she wasn’t Swedish. As the novel goes on, Martin Beck and his team do learn who she was and that she was an American tourist. Bit by bit, they find out about her from friends and people who met her during her trip. And in the end, after a long investigation, they find out who killed her and why. But we never meet her in person.

The same is true in Qiu Xiaolong’s Death of a Red Heroine. The story opens with the discovery of the body of an unknown young woman in Baili Canal near Shanghai. Chief Inspector Chen Cao and his assistant, Detective Yu Guanming, begin an investigation. The woman is identified as Guan Hongying, a national model worker and therefore, somewhat of a celebrity. At first, it’s believed that she was raped and murdered by a cab driver. But Chen has his doubts, and he and Yu begin a more detailed search for answers. Little by little, they get to know things about the victim, and it’s soon clear that they’ll have to be very careful with this case. The trail leads to some very high places and could embarrass some powerful people. We don’t meet Guan Hongying before her murder, but we learn about her as the story moves along.

 Anthony Bidulka’s Amuse Bouche is the first of his novels to feature Russell Quant, a Saskatoon-based PI. He is approached by Harold Chavell to find Chavell’s missing fiancé, Tom Osborn. It seems that Tom has gone to France, where the couple was planning to go for their wedding trip, and is following the honeymoon itinerary. Russell goes to France to trace Tom but is unsuccessful. Harold calls him back to Saskatoon with the idea of ending the search. Then, a body is discovered… In this novel, we never actually meet Tom Osborn. Instead, we learn about him through conversations with people in his life, and through other information Russell gets.

There’s also Judy K. Walker’s Back to Lazarus, which features Tallahassee-based PI Sydney Brennan. A new client called Noel Thomas hires Sydney for an unusual case. In 1980, Noel’s father, Isaac, was imprisoned for the murder of her mother, Vanda. Years later, he died, supposedly of suicide. Noel can’t see why he would have waited so long to commit suicide if he was remorseful about the killing. But if that’s not the reason for the suicide, then what was? And if it wasn’t suicide, what was it? Noel wants her questions answered, and Sydney agrees. The trail is a very dangerous one, and as Sydney links the two deaths, she finds that some people do not want the past to be brought up. Still, she perseveres, and we learn what really happened to both people, and why. Sydney can’t speak to the dead people, so she learns about them from public records and from conversations she has with people who knew them.

And that’s the thing about some crime-fictional murders. We don’t get to meet the victim in person and must form opinions through what other characters say and do, and sometimes from official information. It’s an interesting approach to character development.

*NOTE: The title of this post is a line from Elton John’s Candle in the Wind.

 


6 thoughts on “Though I Never Knew You At All*

  1. It is an interesting approach and can work well. But I find I get more emotionally involved when the victim is introduced to us before the crime, especially when it’s not totally clear which of the characters is destined to be the victim. I feel that may have been an approach that was more common in the Golden Age than it is now, where quite a lot of the story takes place before the crime is committed. Maybe because a lot of modern crime novels tend to focus more on police investigations?

    Like

    1. That’s a really interesting point, FictionFan! Can readers be invested in a character they know is dead? That’s a fascinating way to look at it, and yes, it’s a bit harder when you don’t know who the victim will be. I’m also interested in your point about GA fiction having more of those cases than modern crime fiction. Hmmmm…that is intriguing. And it certainly could be the case. I love the ‘food for thought,’ so thanks!

      Like

  2. An interesting post Margot. As I read in the post of Qiu Xiaolong I thought of a further book in the Inspector Chen series where the victim is dead as the story begins. Red Mandarin Dress will remain in my memory from victims being clothed in beautiful red Mandarin dresses but we only learn about the victims, for it is a serial killer, after they are dead.

    I also thought of L.R. Wright’s book, The Suspect, where we meet the killer on the first page just after he has killed his neighbour. Readers learn most about the neighbour from his killer.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks, Bill. I’m glad you thought the post was interesting. I’m also glad you brought up Red Mandarin Dress. That’s another good example of cases where we learn about the victim(s) only after death. I agree with you that Qiu did a very effective job of creating memorable scenes with those dresses. As for The Suspect, you’ve got a really interesting point there. That story is unusual in that we mostly learn about the victim from his killer. That takes some effective storytelling, I think.

      Like

  3. That’s really interesting Margot, and I can’t say I’ve thought about this aspect very deeply before. But having the victim something of an unknown changes the focus of a story, doesn’t it? We can be more involved in the actual detection process, following the sleuths and perhaps seeing the victim through their eyes – which is not necessarily an accurate view. Intriguing…

    Like

    1. I think you’re quite right, KBR, that not knowing much about a fictional victim does change the focus of a story. Readers do follow the detection process more, and so the story itself has a different perspective. And I’m glad you mentioned the different perspective we get on the victim, too. We see that person as the sleuth, family, and witnesses do, and as you say, that’s not always accurate. That, too, can add to a story, I think.

      Liked by 1 person

What's your view?